The Weekly Gazette

However, Ajit Pai’s plan to end Net Neutrality can backfire. Less we know, the more ignorant we are. The more ignorance, the more foolishness amid the wisdom. As sheep, we follow orders without thinking, questioning, or objecting. No one is perfect; federal organizations aren’t perfect either – they’re humans who legally plastered themselves together. If one man makes a mistake, the whole fortress falls. To let Net Neutrality end is to put the nation itself at risk of more international complications. So, let’s play vigilante. Besides, if the government claims to have nothing to hide, then why are they repealing Net Neutrality? Julian Assange’s legacy did not fade away with him in the Embassy of Ecuador, London, England, UK (by right of asylum).

Stop Ajit Pai. Sign this petition: https://www.change.org/p/save-net-neutrality-netneutrality:  Save Net Neutrality Directly from the petition (VERBATIM): The ability to organize grassroots movements, whether locally or across the globe, is made possible by an open Internet. Since its creation, the Internet has become the world’s megaphone for free speech, protected by the principles of Net Neutrality, which require internet service providers (ISPs) to give everyone equal access to everything you use the internet for -- email, watching videos, listening to music, or signing petitions on Change.org. Without Net Neutrality, ISPs can choose what you see online, favoring some sources or blocking others.  For example, if someone launched a petition on Change.org against a company like Verizon, Net Neutrality prevents Verizon from blocking or slowing their customers’ access to our site. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is moving to end Net Neutrality -- which could

The scientific term for human is homo sapien, Latin for “wise man”. But often times, we are not truly wise; we are too smart for our own good. Our technological advancements have only hindered us in societal and intellectual development, and our ego has ensured that we would never amount from this. There is a story based on a true event. A man once behaved as though existence revolved around him. Upon moving into a new house, he saw the occasional breathtaking abundance of stray animals that would visit the lush and chromatic landscape of his backyard. As though he did not like the presence of the animals, he cut substantial amounts of the greenery, bamboo, trees, bushes, and flowers in the area. What remained was a barren brick wall and far less shade. Less animals were present as well. Occasionally these days, a few cats would come by, but now the usual blue jay never comes back. Has the man depreciated what the previous owners had done to bring life into civilization? The man proc