9/27/2017, 6:35 PM


Previously on IG:

A question can be redefined/defined as its answer. A declarative sentence subconsciously/unconsciously asks of the characteristics that make up what the sentence itself expresses. A branch of this concept is sarcasm. Another branch of this concept is the involuntary urge to ask about the assertions in the sentence.

Thus, a question is redundant introduction and redefinition of its answer. A declarative sentence denies ignorance of what is being stated. If a declarative sentence implies ignorance about something, then it is more likely voluntarily than involuntarily asking about what is not known. However, whether the question is voluntary or involuntary fundamental depends on the animal capable of reasoning that is asking the question.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 DAYS UNTIL NO NET NEUTRALITY - RISE OF DOMESTIC EXTREMISM

Stop Ajit Pai. Sign this petition: https://www.change.org/p/save-net-neutrality-netneutrality:  Save Net Neutrality Directly from the petition (VERBATIM): The ability to organize grassroots movements, whether locally or across the globe, is made possible by an open Internet. Since its creation, the Internet has become the world’s megaphone for free speech, protected by the principles of Net Neutrality, which require internet service providers (ISPs) to give everyone equal access to everything you use the internet for -- email, watching videos, listening to music, or signing petitions on Change.org. Without Net Neutrality, ISPs can choose what you see online, favoring some sources or blocking others.  For example, if someone launched a petition on Change.org against a company like Verizon, Net Neutrality prevents Verizon from blocking or slowing their customers’ access to our site. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is moving to end Net Neutrality ...
Read more

"Those who do learn from history are doomed to repeat it." - George Santayana, philosopher

Cassidy Goodson is not a psychopath or sociopath. Instead, she was in circumstances where she was forced to act against her own morals. She acted in fear of disappointing her parents. Therefore, her parents are strong intimidators. If officials would treat her like an adult, then she would be socially and psychologically damaged. Goodson acted in what was her best interest - her own welfare. Personal welfare is also known as incentive - the motivation to commit a certain task, a certain action - such as in capitalism, the economy on which America depends. As a 14 year old, she could not have developed the right mindset and thought process to be a conventional mother. If I were as closeminded as a racist, I would have supported sending her juvenile detention. I am not, and I am against this socially and mentally incorrect situation. This is actually a matter of legal misunderstanding. - alcosivius, aka. nihilistic_shenanigan From: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/18/cassidy-goo...
Read more

First research, then protest

Earth is a ball. Chemtrails are a silly concept. Mathematics and science were discovered, not invented. Ignore the news, ignore the media. Instead, travel and explore more, regardless of airports' reluctance. People have a right to admit ignorance and endlessly seek knowledge. No government, agency, or organization should have to keep information classified in secrecy. Information is kept away from us, not for our good, but for our ignorance and unawareness. From Instagram. Explore @nihilistic_shenanigan on Instagram for more.
Read more